Connect with us

HEALTH

Allegations of racism leveled at House of Representatives hearing on coronavirus

Published

on

WASHINGTON. Science writer Nicholas Wade arrived on Capitol Hill Wednesday to testify before a Republican commission on the origins of the coronavirus, but was instead asked questions about “Troubled Legacy”, his controversial 2014 book on race and genetics, which Democrats noted was endorsed by notorious racist and anti-Semite David Duke, as well as other white supremacists.

“I have nothing to do with white supremacist views,” Wade said at one point during the hearing.

“However, they love you,” retorted Rep. Kweisi Mfume, M.D., arguing that Wade’s presence was an affront to any legitimate inquiry into the origins of the coronavirus — the subject of Wednesday’s hearing.

Former NAACP head Mfume said he was “appalled that this hearing is now about race.”

Writer Nicholas Wade testifies before a committee of the House of Representatives.

Writer Nicholas Wade testifies Wednesday before a House subcommittee on the coronavirus pandemic. (Chip Somodeville/Getty Images)

Visibly trembling, Mfume told Wade that he was “absolutely offended that you will have the opportunity to take this platform and add something important to it.”

A tense exchange has cast doubt on whether inviting Wade to testify at the first hearing of the House Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic was an effective move by the Republican majority, which seeks to legitimize the notion that the coronavirus was the product of a lab accident in China.

Wade proponent of this hypothesisbut his past writings on genetics and race seem to have frustrated his attempts to focus the conversation on the pandemic.

The committee’s leading Democrat, Rep. Raul Ruiz of California, used his opening statement to discredit Wade. “His participation undermines the credibility of this hearing,” he said.

Briefly, Capitol Hill was plunged into a nearly decade-old controversy, though the topics understandably continue to stir deep passions today.

A native of England and a graduate of Cambridge, Wade has worked for the prestigious Science magazine. and nature in the late 1970s and early 80s, by which point he had settled in the United States. Hello joined the New York Times in 1982. and will remain in the newspaper for 30 years.

Rep. Raul Ruiz speaks at a House subcommittee hearing.

Rep. Raul Ruiz, D-Calif., expresses concern that the subcommittee has invited Wade to testify. (Chip Somodeville/Getty Images)

Wade has written several books in his career, but none have been as explosive as his 2014 foray into the connection between race and genetics—a connection that by then many came with a discount.

In an attempt to repair the disputed correlation, Wade ventured into some of the most obscene areas of what was once known as scientific expertise. (His supporters would say that he was dragged into this dangerous territory by detractors who had not actually read his book, but some of those critics appeared to be familiar with his arguments.)

Racial Science was a favorite pastime of the Nazis, who sought to collect evidence, such as the shape of the skull, to prove that Jews and other people of non-European descent were inherently inferior. eugenicists in the United States, similar arguments were used to try to restrict immigration or expand civil rights for blacks.

While racial differences may seem huge culturally and socially, genetic differences between populations are actually quite insignificant.

Wade objected to this prevailing view. Intending to “demystify the genetic basis of race”, he attempted to describe distinct racial groups that he claimed originated in Africa, Europe, and East Asia. He then attempted to explain how the three groups evolved different genomes and how these differences shape their respective cultures.

These explanations have led to some highly suspicious claims, such as that the Jews were uniquely “adapted to capitalism” – a classic anti-Semitic cliché. Meanwhile, people of African descent, according to Wade’s analysis, had a “violent propensity”.

Former New York Times editor and writer Nicholas Wade.

During Wednesday’s hearing, Wade was asked questions about his controversial 2014 book on race and genetics, A Troubled Legacy. (Chip Somodeville/Getty Images)

The mainstream reaction to the book was harsh. IN his reviewThe Times called A Troubled Legacy a “deeply flawed, misleading and dangerous book” that gives racists license while accused Wade trade in “marginal racist theories masquerading as mainstream biology”. American conservative found the book unconvincing.

IN letter to the New York Times Book ReviewHe was accused by 139 scientists (including many whose work Wade cited) of “misappropriating” research results to advance discrediting arguments. They stated that “in the field of population genetics, Wade’s hypotheses are not supported.”

He hit the news again with the advent of the coronavirus, becoming one of the first science writers to speak out against the plausibility of the prevailing view that the pathogen originated from an animal before it entered the human population, most likely in the U.S. wildlife market. Chinese city of Wuhan.

Wade detailed the case for the so-called laboratory leak theory. Average post in May 2021. This article remains a milestone for other skeptics of the official Chinese version. However, many scientists believe that the virus originated in animals and then passed to humans.

Wade strenuously defended his record – and his book – on Wednesday. “It was a decidedly non-racist book. As far as I know, there are no scientific errors in it. It contains no racist statements. It emphasizes the theme of unity,” he told the deputies sitting in front of him.

But his Democratic critics remained unconvinced, while some supporters of the lab leak hypothesis expressed frustration on social media that the important question of the origin of the coronavirus is being obscured.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HEALTH

Ozempic shortage: Diabetes patients at risk as TikTok and telemedicine prescriptions fuel drug demand

Published

on



CNN

Telemedicine and social media are playing a significant role in boosting demand for Ozempic, a prescription drug for type 2 diabetes, experts told CNN. The current shortage of drugs is limiting access for diabetic patients who rely on them to control their blood sugar levels.

Digital health companies are making it easy to get medicines like Ozempic by providing online prescriptions. Many advertise quick and easy access—sometimes same day—access.

“Oddly enough, getting a cure is almost easier [via digital health companies]said Dr. Disha Narang, endocrinologist and director of obesity treatment at Northwestern Medicine, Lake Forest Hospital. “But not always the safest.” People who reported average weight on online admission forms were still offered an anti-diabetic drug, Narang told CNN.

Partly because of the popularity of Ozempic, the market for prescription weight loss drugs has grown significantly, according to MarketData Enterprises, an independent research and consulting firm. The market has outperformed forecasters’ expectations for 2022 and is expected to be a nearly $2 billion industry by 2023.

WeightWatchers is also tapping into the field of prescription telemedicine. Last week, the company bought a subscription to a telemedicine service that helps patients connect with doctors who can prescribe weight loss and diabetes medications.

“At the beginning of 2022, these companies were not marketing this material,” Narang said, noting that Ozempic advertising began in 2022. “I think we really need to start questioning our ethics in this regard.”

When it comes to the application processes for digital healthcare companies, there are a few general requirements, says Dr. Bree Holtz, an assistant professor of telemedicine at Michigan State University, told CNN. Once the patient completes the required online forms, the information is passed to the in-state provider, who can write the prescription. Some companies require the patient to switch to a video or phone call with a provider – others require neither.

“It’s a little scary that you can just wake up and make an appointment – or these medications – and you won’t be taken care of,” Holtz said.

Telehealth has been a game changer in providing access to healthcare, especially during a pandemic. And especially for people living in places where high-quality primary care isn’t available, direct consumer telehealth services can help fill the gap, the doctor said. Lori Buis is an assistant professor of family medicine at the University of Michigan whose research focuses on digital health.

However, when patients start seeking selective treatment from select providers, Buijs says it opens the door for issues such as fragmented care or abuse. Telehealth providers may not have access to a patient’s complete medical history and may be less able to provide comprehensive care than a primary care physician would otherwise be able to.

“I have no doubt that some of these services are doing their job well,” Buijs said. “There are also services that don’t take it that seriously. And that worries.”

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration first announced a shortage of Ozempic last August. Supplies are likely to be overloaded until mid-March, according to the FDA drug shortage database.

According to a JP Morgan analysis, Ozempic prescriptions in the US reached an all-time high in the last week of February, with more than 373,000 prescriptions filled. IQVIA Data shared with CNN. This is 111% more than the same week in 2022.

According to a CNN review of JP Morgan’s analysis, more than half of these were new prescriptions.

With so many patients relying on Ozempic for their diabetes, providers like Narang struggle to figure out which alternatives to prescribe to their patients.

“We receive daily reports that patients cannot get their own medicines,” Narang said. “It’s been tough for both patients and providers.”

According to a JP Morgan analysis, Ozempic currently holds over 40% market share in the US for glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists, a class of drugs that mimic the appetite-regulating hormone. These drugs work by stimulating the release of insulin, which helps lower blood sugar levels. They also slow down the passage of food through the intestines.

Ozempic has grown rapidly in popularity since it was first introduced to the market in 2018. The drug has been used safely and successfully to help diabetics lower their blood sugar levels and achieve diabetes remission, Narang told CNN. According to her, Ozempic is the most powerful of all GLP-1 drugs.

Behind the Ozempic brand is the drug semaglutide. While Ozempic is used primarily to treat type 2 diabetes, another drug called Wegovy – also semaglutide – is approved specifically for chronic weight management.

Although FDA approved in 2021For most of last year, Wegovy was unavailable, Narang said, so people turned to Ozempic. According to the FDA drug shortage databaseWegovy has been in short supply since the end of March last year, but was back in stock earlier this year.

The social media hype around these two drugs picked up in early 2023. Celebrities shared their testimonies of how semaglutide helped them shed those extra pounds. Elon Muskfor example, publicly credited Ozempic and Wegovy in part for his weight loss.

#Ozempic and #Wegovy have been “extremely popular” on TikTok over the past few months. according to company analytics.

The use of Ozempic and Wegovy for short-term weight loss has had real implications for patients who need drugs for diabetes and chronic weight management, Narang says. For example, some insurance companies have reportedly refused to cover Wegovy in the past, some call it the “vanity drug”.

Both drugs are intended for long-term use, not for short-term weight loss. Their appetite-regulating effects disappear quickly after you stop taking them.

“It’s not a cure to shed the last 5 or 10 pounds to get ready for an event or something like that. It’s not for use within three or four weeks, Narang said. “When we think about weight management, we think about the next 25 years of someone’s life.”

Continue Reading

HEALTH

It’s Time to Dedicate Yourself to Raising Children – Chicago Tribune

Published

on

Dear Amy! I have a very difficult and tense relationship with my mother, and I don’t know what to do about it.

Now I am 19 years old.

My mother is a drug addict and alcoholic, and because of this, she missed most of my early childhood.

When I was about eight, she finally sobered up, but she still had a lot of psychological problems, most likely from years of substance abuse, and she never matured.

She thought only of herself. She hurt me over and over again. She put her motherhood on hold and wasn’t there for me.

I finally had enough when she missed my high school graduation last year. She then lied to me about why she missed it (turns out she was at home the whole time).

I tried to tell her how much it hurt me. In response, she cried, did theatrics, felt sorry for herself, and, in fact, told me that she was giving up on our relationship because she was “failing all the time.”

I begged her to try to change for me, but it seems she would rather wallow in her own grief and cry about how much I hate her.

I don’t hate her; I would like her to try her best so that we can spend the rest of our lives together.

I didn’t see her for almost a year and didn’t speak to her for several months. I’m completely lost and I have no idea how to deal with this.

– Lost, confused and sad daughter

Dear daughter, you are the child of an addict, and you have taken on the heavy burden that your mother’s addiction placed on you.

And, like many children of drug-addicted and narcissistic parents, you would love to force your parent to change so that you can have the healthy parent-child relationship you so desire.

Unfortunately, your mother is unwilling or unable to change for you.

You can, however, change, and that change must be in the direction of securing your own future health and happiness, as well as accepting the lousy card you have played and its limitations.

Your mother’s erratic and frustrating behavior has taught you to take responsibility for the outcome, but you need to find ways to fold that heavy backpack you’ve been carrying.

Every human being craves love and permanence, and you will find it, but most likely not in your mother.

Now is the time for you to make a commitment to educate yourself (and I feel you will be very good at it).

Trusting and emotionally healthy relationships with others will also help you heal.

I suggest you join a “friends and family” support group such as Al-anon or Adult Children of Alcoholics (adult children.org), and read “Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents: How to Heal from Distant, Rejecting, or Selfish Parents” by clinical psychologist Lindsey Gibson (2015), New Harbinger.

Dear Amy! My daughter is engaged to her college boyfriend. Now they live together.

Even though my daughter’s income is well below his, he insists that she pay 50 percent of her expenses. She starts falling behind and goes into debt to keep up.

I would like to know your thoughts.

– Concerned parent

Dear Worried! I’m wondering why your daughter’s fiancé has the right to decide and dictate his family finances?

If they are counting on a marriage in which they will be true partners, then these important issues should be discussed and decided mutually, and not dictated by one partner.

If she manages her money responsibly, but cannot afford to live on these terms, then something needs to change. Ultimately, being in debt is very expensive.

My big point is that this is a red flag. The pressure of duty will add to the pressure of a partner who (at least from this point of view) sounds bossy.

Dear Amy! Like other readers, I was appalled by your response to “Anonymous,” a reader who complained about “free-range” children at family events.

These parents are not only lazy, they are careless. I can’t believe you stood up for them!

– Disorder

Dear Upset! After warning about the dangers and dangers of children running “free range” in other people’s homes, I stood up for these parents.

Anonymous did not mention that these kids were rude or disturbing others – only that they were allowed to run on their own.

(You can write to Amy Dickinson at askamy@amydickinson.com or send an email to Ask Amy, PO Box 194, Freeville, NY 13068. You can also follow her on Twitter. @askingamy or facebook.)

Continue Reading

HEALTH

Weight loss: are injections the answer to the fight against obesity?

Published

on

The attraction is clear – but should we turn to appetite suppressant injections?

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 Thats News Media.