Connect with us

HEALTH

Mockingbird expands recall to include single strollers due to fall hazard

Published

on

  • Mockingbird lot number location

The product’s name:

Single strollers Mockingbird

Danger:

The underside of the stroller frame may crack, which can cause children in the stroller to fall.

revocation date:

March 17, 2023

remember the details

Description:

This recall extension applies to single Mockingbird strollers. Mockingbird strollers are made of aluminum and come in black or silver. The seats are black and the canopies are available in black, light blue, navy blue, pink and light green. The recall extension only applies to single Mockingbird strollers with lot numbers 18322 to 22278 and only lot numbers 23174 and 23175. The lot number is a five-digit number that can be found on the white product label located on the inside left side of the stroller frame at the top of the basket .

means:

Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled Single stroller and contact Mockingbird to receive a free frame reinforcement kit that includes two frame clamps that attach to the sides of the stroller to strengthen the frame. Mockingbird contacts all known buyers directly.

Incidents/Injuries:

The firm received 13 reports of cracks in the frame of single wheelchairs. There are no reports of injuries to children in wheelchairs.

Sold in:

Online at hellomockingbird.com, babylist.com and goodbuygear.com from March 2020 to March 2023 for $350 to $450.

Importer(s):

Mockingbird LLC, New York

Note. Individual commissioners may have statements related to this topic. Please visit www.cpsc.gov/commissioners to search for approvals on this or other topics.

About USCCC

The US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is responsible for protecting the public from the unreasonable risk of injury or death associated with the use of thousands of consumer products. Deaths, injuries and property damage from incidents involving consumer products cost the country more than $1 trillion annually. CPSC’s work in consumer product safety has contributed to the decline in consumer product-related injuries over the past 50 years.

Federal law prohibits any person from selling goods subject to a Commission Order or voluntary recall undertaken in consultation with the CPSC.

Life Saving Information:

Report an unsafe product

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HEALTH

Ask Amy: A volunteer seamstress wants to ask for a bigger donation

Published

on

A comment

Dear Amy: I am a people pleaser, volunteering for a non-profit organization that helps Afghan refugees. We provide fabric and a room with sewing machines where they can come and work. Lately, these women have been making things that they can sell.

Recently we were contacted by “Kara” and asked to create a copy of the dress she had. She told me that if we figured out how to do it, we could let Afghan women make and sell them. She provided fabric for the copy.

I spent six hours figuring out how to make the item and documenting it with photos and instructions. Then I made a sample. I was a professional seamstress, but I am also soft to the touch. I never charge what the job costs. In this case, I was going to ask Kara to donate to charity so we could buy more fabric. One hundred dollars didn’t seem like much.

As it turned out, Kara liked what I did, and she took the sample out the door. I gave her instructions and patterns and she gave me $20 for charity. She also told me that she and a friend could make these dresses and sell them. (I told her that I didn’t think the project would work for Afghan women.)

After she left, I felt taken advantage of, so I called her and told her that she should pay me for my time if she was going to sell this dress design for a profit. However, now I feel guilty! I hate myself for calling her. What am I wrong to call her? Or am I wrong, feeling guilty?

In seams: People often ask if they feel “wrong” in a certain way. And my answer is always the same: your feelings are your feelings. They are neither right nor wrong. They just are. Your job is to allow your feelings to guide you towards understanding and (possibly) change.

Your initial choice prevented you and the organization you support from receiving reasonable compensation. I believe that your chronic underpayment is more a reflection of your confidence in the value of your work than your desire to please. “Kara” walked out the door wearing a custom-tailored dress (as well as a pattern and instructions) for $20.

If you don’t set your price and announce it clearly before doing the job, then you’re giving the buyer the opportunity to guess fair compensation or rip you off gently. I give you the choice to contact Kara Five. Star rating. I hope you take this episode as an opportunity to adjust your business model.

Dear Amy: Over the years, my brother and I stopped communicating. He is venomous, domineering and creates problems among family members. As a result, we, brothers and sisters, do not really communicate with him. Now we are all elders, and he is the elder.

I guess I will survive it as I am the youngest. As I get older, I often think about what I will do when he dies. Should I go to the funeral of an estranged brother if I have fond memories of our relationship from childhood, and I still have a good relationship with his son? (He also has a daughter who withdrew herself from all family communication. It is not known why, but our niece’s silence occurred long before we stopped communicating with her brother.)

I would like to do the right thing with my nephew by supporting him, but I also would not like to create any problems in my brother’s family. I, my other brothers and sisters, and all of our children remain on good terms with family gatherings and fellowship. I believe that I am the only one trying to keep in touch with my nephew.

expectation: Unless you strongly suspect that your presence will make life difficult for your brother’s family and other survivors, then yes – you should attend his funeral. Be careful, express your condolences and do your best to read the room.

Dear Amy: I thought you answered the question too easily from “worried”, a waitress whose fellow waitress smoked cigarettes and weed while pregnant. This is child abuse!

disorder: While this is definitely harmful for both the mother and the baby, I stand by my advice to this colleague not to judge and try to influence this pregnant woman to make better choices.

© 2023 Amy Dickinson. Distributed by content agency Tribune.

Continue Reading

HEALTH

Wyoming becomes first state to ban abortion pills

Published

on

Medical abortion is already banned in states that have total bans because those bans already ban all forms of abortion.

government Mark Gordon Of Wyoming Republican, signed a ban on abortion pills in that state on the same day that he said he would allow another more radical anti-abortion measure to become law without his signature. The law, which takes effect Sunday, bans abortion under virtually all circumstances, making abortion a criminal offence.

“I have acted impartially and after much prayer that these bills become law,” Mr. Gordon wrote in a letter to the Wyoming Secretary of State released Friday evening.

Mr. Gordon said in the letter that he withheld his signature on a broader abortion ban because he feared it would complicate matters in an ongoing legal battle over an earlier abortion ban passed by Wyoming lawmakers.

The broader ban also bans medical abortion, and the measure banning abortion pills will mostly result in additional fines for medical abortion providers.

Both laws are likely to be quickly challenged in court by abortion providers, who will seek to prevent the bans from going into effect while the lawsuit continues. The earlier ban on abortion has so far been blocked by the courts after medical professionals and others filed a lawsuit alleging that the law violates Wyoming’s constitutional guarantee of free healthcare decision making. The recent ban on abortion is an attempt to circumvent this constitutional provision by declaring that abortion is not medical treatment.

The Wyoming Abortion Pill Act goes into effect on July 1. it is illegal to “prescribe, dispense, distribute, sell, or use any drug for the purpose of obtaining or performing an abortion.” Physicians or others found guilty of violating this law will be prosecuted for an offense punishable by up to six months in prison and a $9,000 fine. The law explicitly states that pregnant patients will be exempt from fees and fines.

There is only one clinic in Wyoming that performs abortions, the Women’s Health and Family Care Clinic in Jackson. It only provides for medical abortion, not a surgical procedure.

Earlier versions of the bill named specific drugs: mifepristone and two branded versions of it, and misoprostol, the second drug used in the medical abortion scheme.

But doctors objected, pointing out that misoprostol in particular had many other medical uses, including helping pregnant patients deliver successfully. Doctors have expressed concern that pharmacists will be afraid to stock any drugs, and some Republicans have said abortion drug names could simply be changed to circumvent the law. As a result the final language has been expanded outlaw the use of any abortion drugs without mentioning specific drugs.

In 2023, at least three other bills were introduced to ban medical abortion. In Iowa, the bill was not put to a vote before the end of the legislative session, and in Hawaii, a Democratic state, the bill seemed unlikely to pass.

The bill, introduced in Texas, a state that already bans abortion, includes a host of provisions aimed at cutting off any access to the pill, including making it harder for Texas patients to get information about abortion services or their use outside of the state. The bill would make it illegal to manufacture, distribute, or “provide an abortion drug by any means to any person or place in this state.”

It would also make it illegal “to create, edit, upload, publish, host, maintain, or register a domain name for an Internet site, platform, or other interactive computer service that assists or facilitates a person’s efforts in obtaining an abortion.” drugs.”

Many patients learn about abortion options from websites such as Plan C, a clearinghouse for information about medical abortion. And a growing number of patients in states where abortion is illegal are arranging to get pills through telemedicine websites such as Aid Access, a European service that delivers pills to any state from India, and Hey Jane, one of several US services that will provide pills to patients who travel to a state where abortion is legal and where they can get medicines by mail in those states.

In addition to Wyoming and states with total bans on abortion, 15 states have introduced restrictions on access to medical abortion, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research group that supports abortion rights. These restrictions range from requiring medication to be provided by a doctor to requiring the patient to visit the doctor in person. Several states, including Texas and Arizona, are banning mail-order abortion pills, and mail-in pill bills have been introduced this year in at least three other states.

“We are seeing efforts to further limit access to medical abortion because anti-abortion advocates recognize that even with abortion bans in place in 12 states and no access in two more, patients can still get abortion pills,” said Elizabeth Nash. , state representative. political analyst at the Guttmacher Institute. “Now anti-abortion advocates have taken to the courts, attorneys general and state legislatures to further restrict access to the pill.”

Since January, when newly elected legislatures began to convene for the first time since Dobbs v. USA. The Jackson Women’s Health Organization’s decision ended the national right to abortion, with more than 500 abortion-related bills proposed in states across the country.

Some states, where Democratic legislatures have strong – or even unexpected – majorities, are taking steps to increase protection against abortion. in Minnesota, first account legislature in 2023, making it harder for future legislatures and governors to relax these protections, which signed in January by the governor. Tim Walz, Democrat. In Michigan, the legislature has reiterated the abortion ban, and the governor is expected to be signed by Democrat Gretchen Whitmer.

But most of the new bills are aimed at limiting access to abortion. And now, as several states close their legislative sessions, bills are starting to hit the governors’ tables.

According to another new Wyoming law, “Life is the law of human rights”, performing an abortion or administering abortion drugs would be a criminal offense punishable by up to five years in prison, and doctors would have their license revoked. The law prohibits abortion, with narrow exceptions in cases of rape, incest, and serious risks to the life or health of the pregnant patient.

“While other states are promoting extreme abortion programs comparable to the brutal laws of North Korea and China, Wyoming is pro-life, arguing that life is a human right and providing real support for women,” State Representative Rachel Rodriguez said. Williams, sponsor of the bill.

The law is intended to replace the existing ban, which now suspended due to legal action over its constitutionality. However, it remains to be seen how this will affect the actions of the Wyoming Supreme Court.

It’s about defining health care: Wyoming’s state constitution has the right to make their own decisions about health care. Thus, the new law provides that abortion is not medical care.

“Abortion is not medical care, but the deliberate termination of the life of an unborn child,” the new law says. “It is within the power of the State of Wyoming to determine reasonable and necessary restrictions on abortion, including its prohibition.”

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 Thats News Media.